|   | 
Author Canessa, E.C.; Chaigneau, S.E.
Title When are concepts comparable across minds? Type
Year 2016 Publication Quality & Quantity Abbreviated Journal Qual. Quant.
Volume 50 Issue 3 Pages 1367-1384
Keywords Conceptual Agreement Theory; Conceptual variability; Shared meaning; Agreement
Abstract In communication, people cannot resort to direct reference (e.g., pointing) when using diffuse concepts like democracy. Given that concepts reside in individuals' minds, how can people share those concepts? We argue that concepts are comparable across a social group if they afford agreement for those who use it; and that agreement occurs whenever individuals receive evidence that others conceptualize a given situation similarly to them. Based on Conceptual Agreement Theory, we show how to compute an agreement probability based on the sets of properties belonging to concepts. If that probability is sufficiently high, this shows that concepts afford an adequate level of agreement, and one may say that concepts are comparable across individuals' minds. In contrast to other approaches, our method considers that inter-individual variability in naturally occurring conceptual content exists and is a fact that must be taken into account, whereas other theories treat variability as error that should be cancelled out. Given that conceptual variability will exist, our approach may establish whether concepts are comparable across individuals' minds more soundly than previous methods.
Address [Canessa, Enrique Carlos] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Fac Ingn & Ciencias, Av P Hurtado 750, Vina Del Mar, Chile, Email: ecanessa@uai.cl;
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Springer Place of Publication Editor (up)
Language English Summary Language Original Title
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN 0033-5177 ISBN Medium
Area Expedition Conference
Notes WOS:000374458900025 Approved
Call Number UAI @ eduardo.moreno @ Serial 614
Permanent link to this record